maybe that’s not a question for this forum but since you already mentioned a couple of systems:
How do GAP and Sage compare in this regard? I’d have expected them to be competitive in this field as well. Am 05.11.20 um 17:24 schrieb Henry Rich: > There are real experts about this on this list, and I am not among them; > but when I was teaching Calc 3/Linear Algebra I looked around for > symbolic-math packages & found 3 to be highly regarded: Mathematica, > Maple, and MACSYMA. Each has its adherents, but MACSYMA is free, so the > class used that. It sufficed for our simple manipulations. > > Henry Rich > > On 11/5/2020 10:20 AM, David Lambert wrote: >> I recommend mathematica as a good choice for symbolic algebra, and keep a >> Raspberry Pi which came with mathematica in the software >> distribution. For >> simple problems wolframalpha.com suffices. >> At wolframalpha.com try >> Solve[(x^2+Log[y])^(1)==c,x] >> and >> Solve[(x^2+Log[y])^(1)==c,y] >> >> Mathematica can express the output in many forms >> >> FortranForm[expression] >> CForm[expression] >> TeXForm >> >> alas, no JForm >> >> >>> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:27:36 +1100 >>> From: Piet de Jong <[email protected]> >>> To: Programming forum <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [Jprogramming] Implicit functions >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > -- ---------------------- mail written using NEO neo-layout.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
