And there’s more than one way of doing so. But I don’t think anyone would want this to happen in every calculation, in any algorithm. It’s okay to have a function you call every time you might actually want to consider the smaller one 0 but not with every intermediate result.
From my point of view, there are use cases, and they can be dealt with by users. This one isn’t even worth a new primitive in my opinion. I do think there are better ways to bloat the language. Am 19.02.21 um 21:50 schrieb Raul Miller: > So we > have to deal with epsilon issues. -- ---------------------- mail written using NEO neo-layout.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
