I thought that’s the way the julia interfaces to both gnuplot and gnu scientific work like. They should send raw data to a process rather than writing to files – don’t they? And both R and python would disappoint me as well if they didn’t do so. But maybe I misunderstood what exact kind of difference you were talking about?
Am 22.02.21 um 18:47 schrieb Emir U: > Thanks Mike, I'm a J neophyte so take this with a pinch of salt. I think that > the best way to make J relevant for statistics is well thought through deep > bindings to the following libraries: GNU Plot, GNU Scientific. Not clunky > write to a file then run it in the background type stuff, but well thought > through data types and the ability to seamlessly pipe one thing into the > next. That's well over 1000 functions all together including practically > everything. It'd be sheer bliss for the esoteric mathematical statistician in > my opinion and something truly different to the usual throw-up between > R/Python/Julia. Emir > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- ---------------------- mail written using NEO neo-layout.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
