I understand. I was following LJ section 15.2.  So in the console I typed: bc=: 
<“
When I tried calling which works as <“0 y but must use 0 bc y
which totally confused me.  Further down on that section I see that (quote):
The argument to be supplied to the conjunction can be a noun or a verb, and on 
the left or on the right. Altogether there are four similar schemes:
        x (C N)  means  x C N
        x (C V)  means  x C V
        x (N C)  means  N C x
        x (V C)  means  V C x
the last one shows my use case, but doesn’t explain why.

Also, just saw the response from Adrien.

Thank you both!

> On Oct 10, 2021, at 1:37 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Adrien has got this and I will let him answer your question.
> 
> BUT: if you are new to J, know that no one would write 0(<") in a normal 
> sentence.  The natural form is <"0 .
> 
> Henry Rich
> 
> On 10/10/2021 4:33 PM, P Padilcdx wrote:
>> Thank you for the quick reply. Got the adverb part, thank you. But I’m still 
>> missing something fundamental.  If u=< and C=“, V=uC in [x] v V y, what is v 
>> in [x] u C v y when called as 0(<“)y? Thank you for your patience!
>> 
>>> On Oct 10, 2021, at 1:13 PM, Adrien Mathieu <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> I think there is a confusion. <" is not a hook, it's an adverb, because < 
>>> is a verb and " a conjunction, and so technically <" is a partial 
>>> application of a conjunction. More generally, if you have a conjunction C, 
>>> uC is the adverb V such that [x] v V y is [x] u C v y and, similarly, Cv is 
>>> the adverb V such that [x] u V y is [x] u C v y.
>>> 
>>> This is not to be confused with a hook, which is only about verbs (to keep 
>>> it simple). You would have a hook if " was a verb.
>>> 
>>> So, to answer your question, (<") is an adverb, and 0(<")y is <"0 y 
>>> (according to the above definition).
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Adrien Mathieu
>>> 
>>> On 10/10/2021 21:43, P Padilcdx wrote:
>>>> J noob so pardon the noob question. As the subject indicates, I’m confused 
>>>> as to how or why <“0 y turns into 0(<“)y when interpreted as a hook. 
>>>> Looked at the Primer and LJ and they don’t really explain the jump between 
>>>> the “0 to the left” and the “0 to the right” transposition when a hook.  
>>>> Any pointers would be appreciated.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>>> Pete
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> 
> 
> -- 
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to