Cpu cores in my MacBook air m1 is 4+4 while that in your m1 pro is 8+2.
Also I run in low power mode.


On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 4:49 AM Elijah Stone <[email protected]> wrote:

> I wonder if the older hardware had bad double-prec performance?  If you
> send me binaries I can compare them.
>
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022, bill lam wrote:
>
> > On my macbook air m1. time taken is about 0.3 sec.
> > Applying your patch and then linked with the framework didn't show any
> > improvement.
> >
> > If you want optimized gemm performance, you need to compile with
> > USE_OPENMP=1
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 4:09 PM Elijah Stone <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Recent apple arm CPUs include a hardware coprocessor for matrix
> >> multiplication.  This is nominally not directly accessible to user code
> >> (though it has been partly reverse engineered), but must be accessed
> >> through apple's blas implementation.  Attached trivial patch makes j use
> >> this rather than its own routines for large matrix multiplication on
> >> darwin/arm.  Performance delta is quite good.  Before:
> >>
> >>     a=. ?1e3 2e3$0
> >>     b=. ?2e3 3e3$0
> >>     100 timex 'a +/ . * b'
> >> 0.103497
> >>
> >> after:
> >>
> >>     100 timex 'a +/ . * b'
> >> 0.0274741
> >>     0.103497%0.0274741
> >> 3.76708
> >>
> >> Nearly 4x faster!
> >>
> >> There seems to be a warmup period (big buffers go brrr...), so the gemm
> >> threshold should perhaps be tuned.  I did not take detailed
> measurements.
> >>
> >> (Fine print: benchmarks taken on a 14in macbook w/m1pro.)
> >>
> >> Also of note: on desktop (zen2), numpy is 3x faster than j.  I tried
> >> swapping out j's mm microkernel for the newest from blis, and got only a
> >> modest boost, so the problem is not there.  I think numpy is using
> >> openblas.  (On arm, j and numpy are reasonably close, and the hardware
> >> accelerator smokes both.)
> >>
> >>   -E
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to