dbcut (13!:19) seems to go up one stack level and immediately reexecute the line that failed.  Huh?

Unless you have a stop on that line, you will rerun it and it will fail again.  If you do have a stop on the line, the reexecution is nugatory.

Can anyone suggest a reason why 'cut back' should not just cut the stack back and remain in suspension?

[It is possible that I have read the code wrong.]

Henry Rich




--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to