I would favor ~.!.1.  No mnemonic value, but less likely to be forgotten.

What is your fast algorithm?

Henry Rich

On 4/9/2022 4:03 AM, Elijah Stone wrote:
Suppose that ~. (and perhaps some relatives) can be implemented much more efficiently if no guarantee is made about the order of the result.  Is it too much of an abuse of notation to use ({~?~@#)@~. as a special combination to invoke such an algorithm?  If so, what would be better?

Most special combinations would not incur a performance penalty vs an alternate expression of the same semantics on an implementation which did not recognise special combinations.  But I cannot think of any way of expressing ambivalence regarding the order of a result other than shuffling it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm


--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to