Then, I guess, this is a suboptimal way of solving the problem. Keeping track 
of the digits in a seperate variable in a recursive tacit function seems like a 
pain compared to being removing limitations on comparisons. 4--5 decimal places 
is more than enough for this case.


May 17, 2022, 17:54 by hauke.r...@uni-jena.de:

> you can’t go much higher than that so if anything
> I would have worked my way /down/ from there
>
> for an analytical perspective correct the mistake in my first answer
> replacing max with min and you may start upwards from ~8.23e_13
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to