Multiple refcards is certainly possible. The source for the tables will
be available and anybody who wants to select parts for a refcard is
welcome to do so.
Henry Rich
On 8/4/2022 12:53 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
1: a
2: no opinion (the font was too small on my screen, so I resized it larger)
3: no opinion (for the same reason though it was easier to read by default)
4: I am not sure. I did not find mnemonic value in the colors -- I
think I would have preferred colors where increasing valence
corresponded to increasing color wavelength (N, V, A, C vs. perhaps
Red Green Blue Purple).
5: I found some of the mnemonic names to be mildly useful (e.g. "key"
was faster to locate visually than /.) But I do not have strong
opinions here.
6: I don't really understand the question, but I think that the m!:n
value is critical for !: documentation.
7: Since this is incomplete coverage, I would be tempted to either
leave out extremely well understood operations (like x+y) or structure
the page to take advantage of similarities (x+y in same row as +y for
example).
That said, it might be worth thinking about domain specific reference
cards (for example a reference card focusing on logical operations,
showing parallels between primitive boolean and bayesian dyads and b.
operations, or a reference card focusing on complex arithmetic showing
parallels between trig and exponentials, Maybe not right away (it
would be worth spending some time thinking about useful approaches,
but... that's where my thoughts went, looking at this.)
Thanks,
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
