Yeah, great workaround, thanks!
Ben

On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 16:40, Elijah Stone <elro...@elronnd.net> wrote:

> That looks rather serious.  It seems some problem with the hashing
> function is
> causing an unreasonably high rate of collisions.  As a temporary
> workaround,
> you can try using ~.&.:(1&|."1), or use the 32-bit version.
>
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2022, Ben Gorte wrote:
>
> > G'day,
> >
> >
> > Still J-ing along, I believe I ran into a little performance issue.
> >
> > I can strip it down into:
> >
> >
> > A3=:?1000000 3$100 NB. three columns of random numbers 0 .. 99
> >
> > A31 =: A3,.1 NB. with an extra column of 1-s
> >
> > A4=:?1000000 4$100 NB. or four random columns
> >
> > 6!:2 'echo $~.A3'
> >
> > 632783 3
> >
> > 0.037673
> >
> > 6!:2 'echo $~.A31'
> >
> > 632783 4
> >
> > 24.6091
> >
> > That's 600 times longer!
> >
> >
> > However,
> >
> > 6!:2 'echo $~.A4'
> >
> > 995025 4
> >
> > 0.43277
> >
> > is again much quicker.
> >
> >
> > This is consistent over versions 807, 903 and 904, all with Ubuntu linux.
> >
> >
> > I do need the fourth column and it has many 1-s (not all).
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ben
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to