Ok thanks. I didn’t want to “reinvent the wheel." > On 20 Aug 2023, at 07:54, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't know. The last I used it was years ago. I had to make new wrappers > sometimes; it was straightforward. > > Henry Rich > > On 8/19/2023 5:35 PM, Piet de Jong wrote: >> Thank you! Very helpful. >> >> Are there an cgee*.ijs scripts equivalent to dgee*.ijs scripts? >> Or do they have to be crafted from eg their equivalent dgee*.ijs >> counterparts? >> >>> On 20 Aug 2023, at 06:43, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> You need cgee* for complex. >>> >>> Henry Rich >>> >>> On 8/19/2023 4:03 PM, Piet de Jong wrote: >>>> I’ve just updated to J9.4 and Lapack2. >>>> >>>> The verb do_dgeev from math/lapack2 appears to work fine for real >>>> matrices. >>>> >>>> However it gives a “domain error" when applied to a complex matrices. >>>> >>>> Is this how it should be? Or I am missing something? >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
