The ( was a curtailed copy.
I'd considered briefly $:'s context prior to thinking it shouldn't change in
either case, thinking it extended to the the parentheses around the gerund,
conjunction and verb. I didn't know the details of self-recurance's scope.
Using either of 3 :'... y' and {{...y}} fixes this.
Thank you; sorry for the false alarm.
Oct 18, 2023, 02:04 by rauldmil...@gmail.com:
> This sentence gives me an error even without parens.
>
> Looking closer, I see six left parentheses and seven right parentheses here:
>
> ({:`([:$:0 1&+)@.(9&<@{.)@(([:*/"."0@":@{.),{:))"1(|:@,:1:))50 25 33 22 293
>
> Getting rid of the far right parenthesis gives me the result which you
> displayed.
>
> Meanwhile, you're using $:
>
> And, incorporating (|:@,:1:) into the $: phrase changes the context of
> $: which means that it also changes the definition used for evaluating
> $: -- so you'll need to do something about that. There's several
> possibilities, and using a name for the $: phrase is one of those.
>
> I hope this helps,
>
> --
> Raul
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 6:26 PM 'Viktor Grigorov' via Programming
> <programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I have a bit of code I want to include into something large, but I'm hitting
>> a wall.
>>
>> ({:`([:$:0 1&+)@.(9&<@{.)@(([:*/"."0@":@{.),{:))"1(|:@,:1:))50 25 33 22 293
>> 1 2 1 1 3
>>
>> Okay. Slap on some parens, and it fails? Valence error for {:..? Both
>> resolve to 3, a verb, according to 4!:0. Because both verbs are monadic, I
>> tried capping either and both, all composing conjunctions, parenthesizing.
>> Adding in ]. or [., I don't see what the problem is, or how tail's valence
>> fits into it? Some configurations increase the dimensions and don't give out
>> the desired thing:
>>
>> (({:`([:$:0 1&+)@.(9&<@{.)@(([:*/"."0@":@{.),{:))"1 @ (|:@,:1:))50 25 33 22
>> 293
>> 1 0
>> 0 0
>>
>> 1 1
>> 0 0
>>
>> 1 0
>> 0 0
>>
>> 1 0
>> 0 0
>>
>> 1 1
>> 1 0
>>
>> However, assigning both to names and composing does work
>>
>> q=:|:@,:1:
>> w=:({:`([:$:0 1&+)@.(9&<@{.)@(([:*/"."0@":@{.),{:))"1
>> w q 50 25 33 22 293
>> 1 2 1 1 3
>> (w@q)50 25 33 22 293
>> 1 2 1 1 3
>>
>> What am I missing? This to me is unexpected behavior. I expect
>> parethesization and variable substitution to be identical, but it's not. I'm
>> sure there's a single, explanatory/exculpatory line somewhere about
>> assignments, variables and or parentheses on the wiki, but it's not easily
>> discoverable..
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
