You are welcome. By the way, I just noticed that nc could be redefined as,
nc=. >:@:
Best wishes on your recovery
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 1:35 PM Martin Kreuzer <i...@airkreuzer.com> wrote:
> @Raul | @Pepe -
>
> Sorry for the delay.
> I was ill for quite some time (slowly recovering).
> Thanks for your detailed answers.
>
> With season's greetings
> -Martin
>
> At 2023-06-13 21:11, you wrote:
>
> >Exactly: "(extra parentheses and spaces for clarity)"
> >
> >On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 2:27 PM Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > [I thought I had sent this yesterday, but today I find it in draft
> status]
> >
> > > Note that you can eliminate some of the parenthesis here, and some of
> > > the quotation marks (though this does place a burden on the reader's
> > > understanding of j syntax):
> >
> > > ({{y`:6 nc`''}} ^: 9 +:`'') (`:6) 7
> > > 23
> >
> > > or
> >
> > > ({{y`:6 nc`''}} ^: 9 +:`'') `:6 ]7
> > > 23
> >
> > > The final parentheses are essential (to force early verb evaluation).
> >
> >
> > > --
> > > Raul
> >
> > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 7:01 PM Jose Mario Quintana
> > > <jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > (3 : '((y`:6) nc)`''''' ^: 9 +: (`'')) (`:6) 7
> > > > 23
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 6:57 PM Jose Mario Quintana <
> > > > jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Concisely,
> > > > >
> > > > > ncver=. 3 : '((y`:6) nc)`'''''
> > > > > (ncver ^: 9 +: (`'')) (`:6) 7
> > > > > 23
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 6:46 PM Jose Mario Quintana <
> > > > > jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> An alternative way is verbing, so to speak, the (nc) adverb
> taking and
> > > > >> producing instead the gerunds corresponding to the verbs,
> powering the
> > > > >> verbed adverb (ncver) and converting the resulting gerund back to
> the
> > > > >> desired verb (extra parentheses and spaces for clarity),
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ncver=. 3 : 0
> > > > >> u=. (y`:6)
> > > > >> v=. u nc
> > > > >> v (`'')
> > > > >> )
> > > > >>
> > > > >> (ncver ^: 2 +: (`'')) (`:6) 7
> > > > >> 16
> > > > >> (ncver ^: 9 +: (`'')) (`:6) 7
> > > > >> 23
> > > > >>
> > > > >> PS. The previous generation of interpreters allowed one
> (illegally,
> > > of
> > > > >> course) to operate directly on the entities without having to go
> back
> > > > >> and forth. For example, one can just write,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> +: ((Ver 'nc')^:9 adv) 7
> > > > >> 23
> > > > >>
> > > > >> using the suitable utilities (Ver) for verbing and (adv) for
> > > adverbing.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 6:12 AM Martin Kreuzer <
> i...@airkreuzer.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Dear all -
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Having used Fixed Power (u^:n y) before, I noticed that it works
> on
> > > > >>> the verb-adverb compound to its left.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Let's have a simple, silly example:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> nc=. 1 : '[: >: u' NB. defining an adverb 'increase'
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> +: i. nc 7 NB. which works fine
> > > > >>> 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Using Fixed Power like
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> +: nc ^:1 (7)
> > > > >>> 15
> > > > >>> +: nc ^:2 (7)
> > > > >>> 31
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I do get the expected results (compound is executed once, twice).
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Here we have a verb, followed by two adverbs (if I understand
> > > correctly).
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> What I have initially been looking for however, is how to apply
> the
> > > > >>> *same* adverb repeatedly, like
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> +: nc nc (7)
> > > > >>> 16
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> while having the adverb part "nc nc" somehow abbreviated.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> What would be a (or the) way to phrase that ?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks.
> > > > >>> -M
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >>> For information about J forums see
> > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
