I tested the revised code and it works properly for the examples, returning *_4 1 11;3 12* for *qcf 10 _1 _3 2* whereas the older version gives the same result (*0;12 3*) for both *qcf 10 _1 _3 2* and *qcf 10 1 _3 2*. I edited the body of *qcf* to remove the commented out line that Martin revised since his change looks correct.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 2:42 PM Martin Kreuzer <i...@airkreuzer.com> wrote: > Hi all - > > (This wasn't an easy one for me, as I still very much miss him.) > > I have been into CF for some time and re-read the essay this morning. > > It looks as there was a small glitch (maybe typo) in the body of function > *qcf. > > May I ask you (having much more experience than me) to have a look at > my edits as I do by no means want to spoil something. > > Many thanks. > > -Martin > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- Devon McCormick, CFA Quantitative Consultant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
