(Apologies if this seems to veer off into a topic more suited for chat...)
Oleg - you're probably aware of the the whole lomography movement (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lomography) based on this camera.  However,
it has spawned an aesthetic beyond the camera itself that encompasses a
casual, snapshot-based style of picture taking.  In fact, there's even a
tutorial
on turning regular (digital) photos into "lomos":
http://www.flickr.com/groups/technique/discuss/12082/ .

In any case, as a big fan of digital photography (see my flickr site
http://www.flickr.com/photos/photonatic/ which has some J-generated graphs
snuck in), I would concur with
Cliff's notion that a new camera would make a lot of sense for projects like
this.

An interesting topic touched on briefly here is one that Bjorn brought up a
while ago:
how do you identify the "same" object (or sub-picture) within different
pictures?  This
would help with the alignment problem we've just mentioned.  Also, there's a
couple of
applications for this solution to two different types of high-resolution
photos: one where
you stitch together multiple photos to get a large, highly-detailed one (see
http://www.tawbaware.com/maxlyons/) and another where you combine two or
more photos of
same scene taken with different exposure settings - high dynamic range - see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_dynamic_range_imaging.

A good digital photography FAQ is here:
http://www.cs.duke.edu/~parr/photography/faq.html .

On 4/27/07, Oleg Kobchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

The frames are perfectly the same size. It's just
that the bordering frames were chopped off, which could
happen at a photo store. So you might be better off
scanning the original film.

Anyway, of you apply correct padding to compensate for
the chop-off, the splitting is simply even cut operation.

However, if you superimpose the frames you see camera
movement against still background. So probably a better
solution is a mouse-driven tool to align the frames.
But the original split can still be done evenly with padding.

LOMO stands for Leningrad Optical-Mechanical Organization.
Smena 8M was my first camera when I was 8 or 9. You had
to mix the chemicals and develop your own prints in black
and white. I also owned Agat 18 which took split frames:
72 off of 36 frame film.

...
--
Devon McCormick, CFA
^me^ at acm.
org is my
preferred e-mail
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to