Terrence Brannon wrote: > I'm sure many of you are suspecting that I am doing a > naive implementation of ... I think Roger's solution > ... is optimized and hence not acceptable.
Like others, I am annoyed by the concept of a language shootout which forces you to use a naive implementation. What is the point of comparing languages if you're not allowed to use the advantages intrinsic to each language? My Op Ed piece is here: http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/DanBron/Naive -Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
