The test

(ts -: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:) 'YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss.sss'

will fail if the time is updated between the reads from the clock.
(I don't know if that's possible in the implementation).

Henry Rich
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Hui
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 4:43 PM
> To: Programming forum
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Current time: behaviour
> 
> So you want to be a language implementer?  See:
> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Essays/Timestamp_Extension
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Roger Hui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:25
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Current time: behaviour
> To: Programming forum <[email protected]>
> 
> > That's a nice idea.  The function, not the dotage.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Devon McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:10
> > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Current time: behaviour
> > To: Programming forum <[email protected]>
> > 
> > > A nice extension to "6!:0" would be a format string, e.g. 
> > > something like
> > > 
> > >     6!:0 'MM/DD/YY hh:mm:ss'
> > > 10/30/07 14:06:13
> > > 
> > > As has been mentioned before, restricting the argument now and 
> > making the
> > > above construction an error leaves the door open for a compatible
> > > enhancement like this, perhaps when Roger is in his dotage.
> > > 
> > > On 10/30/07, Randy MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ...and I fail to see what quality of foreigns justifies 
> the domain
> > > > restriction.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see 
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to