On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 9:52 PM, bill lam<[email protected]> wrote: >> We already have this. >> noun verb noun noun >> noun noun verb noun noun >> noun noun noun noun noun verb noun noun noun noun >> >> I can construct all of those, but I must use explicit J rather than >> tacit J. > > I don't believe unless you use similar method as Dan. The parsing > stack already rule out 'noun noun' as error. > noun noun } noun > is valid but it is neither noun noun or noun noun verb noun
change "verb" to "non-noun" -- they would be adverbs or conjunctions. Hopefully the first case is obvious, as a conjunction, taking arguments x m n and y? -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
