Congratulations! Maybe a brief mention on the Wiki, with any attachments, would help a future traveller?
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:24 PM, David Hotham <[email protected] > wrote: > So it turns out, to my great surprise, that apparently I am capable of > making this work after all. > > Attached is a version of fftw.ijs that seems to give correct results > against fftw3 (on my 64-bit Windows machine, using libfftw3-3.dll from > http://www.fftw.org/install/windows.html). Anyone should feel free to do > with this what they will, at least so far as my contribution to it goes. > > If there's somewhere more useful that I should submit this, do let me know. > > David > > > "bill lam" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... > > I suspect the 64-bit dll (fftw3) but J used an older version fftw2 (or >> fftw1?) You either update the j script to use the newer dll or compile >> the binary from source for the older version. >> >> Chris Burke should be the maintainer for addons, however he is unpaid >> for these work and he got other day-jobs to keep him busy. Therefore >> you are expected to DIY. >> >> ĵaŭ, 18 Mar 2010, David Hotham skribis: >> >>> cder'' >>> 1 0 >>> >>> which apparently means 'file not found'. >>> >>> It seems to be looking in the right place, though. Copying this from >>> fftw.ijs: >>> >>> DLL=: '"',~'"',jpath '~addons\math\fftw\jfftw.dll' >>> >>> I get >>> >>> DLL >>> "C:\Program Files\j64-602\addons\math\fftw\jfftw.dll" >>> >>> which looks like the right file name. >>> >>> There exist precompiled 64-bit Windows FFTW dlls (see >>> http://www.fftw.org/install/windows.html). Using any of these I get >>> error 2 >>> 0 instead ('procedure not found'). This seems like (slight) progress. >>> >>> At this point I'm afraid I'm going to give up. I doubt my ability to >>> resolve whatever the issue now is (and am quite certain that I'm not >>> going >>> to be able to do it efficiently). >>> >>> Is there an official maintainer for this addon who it would be worth >>> notifying of this? Or is it just a question of waiting for someone more >>> competent / determined to show up? >>> >>> Unless some kindly soul wants to take up the fight, it seems that I'll >>> just >>> have to stick to 32-bits per R.E.Boss's suggestion. >>> >>> David >>> >>> "bill lam" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>> news:[email protected]... >>> [---=| TOFU protection by t-prot: 24 lines snipped |=---] >>> >> >> -- >> regards, >> ==================================================== >> GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 >> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- Devon McCormick, CFA ^me^ at acm. org is my preferred e-mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
