On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Dan Bron <[email protected]> wrote:
> These arguments and others were presented in an earlier thread, "Proposed 
> inverse for monad I.",  
> http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2006-April/026874.html  .

Ah, great!  Thanks for the link.

Ambrus
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to