Thank you. What I really meant to ask is whether or not it is possible to tacitly write verbs where one does something to one argument, gives the result as an argument to a conjunction or adverb and then applies the other argument to the result.
2010/9/10 R.E. Boss <[email protected]>: > (>+:)~ > > > R.E. Boss > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: [email protected] [mailto:programming- >> [email protected]] Namens Justin Paston-Cooper >> Verzonden: vrijdag 10 september 2010 10:42 >> Aan: Programming forum >> Onderwerp: [Jprogramming] A Tacit Definition >> >> Hello, >> >> Is it possible to tacitly define the following dyad? >> >> f =: 4 : '(>&(2*x)) y' >> >> If not, is it possible to do it using adverb composition? >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
