> Just now, checking the results of signum on edge conditions, I was intrigued > to find that "_1 0 1 -: *__ _. _".
I assume that *__ being _1 and *_ being 1 are not surprising to you. *_. being 0 (or anything else) falls under the rubric, all bets are off when _. is involved. ----- Original Message ----- From: Devon McCormick <devon...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, September 23, 2010 6:56 Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Classification problem To: Programming forum <programming@jsoftware.com> > I like the prepending idea because it makes explicit the > expected domain and > puts any unexpected elements (unlikely in the case of monadic > "*" - except > if complex numbers sneak in) at the end where they are out of > the way but > easy to find. > > Just now, checking the results of signum on edge conditions, I > was intrigued > to find that "_1 0 1 -: *__ _. _". > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:24 AM, R.E. Boss > <r.e.b...@planet.nl> wrote: > > > I agree. First comes correctness, then performance, then elegance. > > > > > > R.E. Boss > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > Van: programming-boun...@jsoftware.com [mailto:programming- > > > boun...@jsoftware.com] Namens Brian Schott > > > Verzonden: donderdag 23 september 2010 14:41 > > > Aan: Programming forum > > > Onderwerp: Re: [Jprogramming] Classification problem > > > > > > I agree that this solution is elegant, but for a large data > set I > > > assume that Raul's idea of prepending and then dropping 3 elements > > > would be more efficient. Don't you, too? > > > > > > (<@}./.~ *) _1 0 1,data > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:26 AM, R.E. Boss > <r.e.b...@planet.nl> wrote: > > > > One of the more elegant solutions is > > > > > > > > ((/:&(* </. ])) *) data > > > > +---------------+---+-----+ > > > > |_3 _1 _10 _2 _4|0 0|1 1 6| > > > > +---------------+---+-----+ > > > > > > > > > > > > R.E. Boss > > > > > > > > > > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > >> Van: programming-boun...@jsoftware.com > [mailto:programming- > > > >> boun...@jsoftware.com] Namens Marshall Lochbaum > > > >> Verzonden: woensdag 22 september 2010 23:57 > > > >> Aan: Programming forum > > > >> Onderwerp: Re: [Jprogramming] Classification problem > > > >> > > > >> It looks to me like the most terse way is > > > >> ((</. /: ~...@[)~ f) data > > > >> > > > >> Although this computes the nub twice, unlike some earlier > solutions.> > >> > > > >> Marshall > > > >> > > > >> ________________________________________ > > > >> From: programming-boun...@jsoftware.com [programming- > > > >> boun...@jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Raul Miller [ > > rauldmil...@gmail.com] > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:29 PM > > > >> To: Programming forum > > > >> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Classification problem > > > >> > > > >> Note, if * is the universe of interesting > > > >> functions (if it does not need to be generic) then > > > >> I would be tempted to use a variation on Dan's > > > >> second suggestion: > > > >> > > > >> (<@}./.~ *) _1 0 1,data > > > >> > > > >> Note that this also preserves the relative > > > >> ordering of the data items. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
