A better representation is ((e.>)~/ ;) I didn't consider that the items inside the boxes of y could be boxed.
Marshall On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Marshall Lochbaum <[email protected]> > wrote: > > It's equivalent to (e.&>~/ ;) : > > (e. -: (e.&>~/ ;)) <<1 > 0 > > But this might be a bug? > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
