Here is my attempt to make [: lovable. You love 0, don’t you?
g When f is [: in the diagram at left
/ \ the left branch disappears and you
f h get the diagram below: “I do nothing”
| | [: is like “I am nothing” 0 .
y y
g
\
h
|
y
g Also here when f is [: the left
/ \ branch disappears and you get
f h the diagram below: “I do nothing”
/ \ / \ [: is like “I am nothing” 0 .
x y x y
g
\
h
/ \
x y
Diagrams adapted from Dictionary Section II F. Trains
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Tracy Harms<[email protected]> wrote:
...
>> Also, I do see ways in which trains are more simple than modifier phrases.
>> I think this simplicity is significantly *reduced* by the incorporation of
>> Cap, whereas @ can be fruitfully associated with function composition as
>> documented in uncounted texts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
