Here is my attempt to make [: lovable. You love 0, don’t you?
g When f is [: in the diagram at left / \ the left branch disappears and you f h get the diagram below: “I do nothing” | | [: is like “I am nothing” 0 . y y g \ h | y g Also here when f is [: the left / \ branch disappears and you get f h the diagram below: “I do nothing” / \ / \ [: is like “I am nothing” 0 . x y x y g \ h / \ x y Diagrams adapted from Dictionary Section II F. Trains > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Tracy Harms<kalei...@gmail.com> wrote: ... >> Also, I do see ways in which trains are more simple than modifier phrases. >> I think this simplicity is significantly *reduced* by the incorporation of >> Cap, whereas @ can be fruitfully associated with function composition as >> documented in uncounted texts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm