> both verbs load and require come from stdlib, so that either it will fail...
...I see, whereas in j602 they were defined in jadefull.ijs . >why did you need it? Because scores of my scripts contain it, and will run unaltered otherwise. I'd rather not have to go changing (eg) require 'files stdlib' to: require 'files' NB. (I see that works in fact!) require '~system/main/stdlib.ijs' everywhere it occurs. I want to avoid maintaining different versions of scripts for j602 and j7 as far as feasible. Since stdlib can be taken for granted, I guess just to ignore it in require will suffice. On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 1:17 AM, bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com> wrote: > J7 could be changed to ignore instead of raise an error for it. However > both verbs load and require come from stdlib, so that either it will fail > or just a no-op, why did you need it? > > Сбт, 03 Дек 2011, Ian Clark писал(а): >> Can I offer a suggestion which would assist the porting of j602 code >> to j7 jhs? ... >> >> As it stands, >> require 'stdlib' >> -won't work in j7 jhs: it incorrectly locates: 'stdlib'. Ditto: >> require 'stdlib files' >> load 'stdlib' >> >> Can we have these idioms supported in j7 jhs as they are in j602 please? >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > -- > regards, > ==================================================== > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm