Yes.

That was a mistake.

-- 
Raul

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Bo Jacoby <bojac...@yahoo.dk> wrote:
> Didn't you swap 'cardinal' and 'ordinal' below?
>
> I think that 'first' and 'second' are ordinal numbers while 'zero', 'one' and 
> 'two' are cardinal numbers.
>
> Ordinal numbers identify items, while cardinal numbers identify in-betweens 
> by counting sets of items.
>
>
> This century is century no 21. The first year of this century is year no 
> 2001, and the last year of this century is year no 2100. Many people 
> celebrated the new century when year 1999 turned into year 2000 - one year 
> too early! Embarrassing!
>
> When this century started, 2000 years had passed. When this century ends, 
> 2100 years have passed.
>
> Arithmetic is done on cardinal numbers, not on ordinal numbers. That is why 
> i.3 is 0 1 2, I suppose.
>
> A very useful arithmetic can be defined on ordinal fractions, but that is a 
> different story.
> - Bo
>
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>> Fra: Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com>
>>Til: Programming forum <programming@jsoftware.com>
>>Sendt: 17:15 søndag den 18. december 2011
>>Emne: Re: [Jprogramming] J Midterm exam 2011
>>
>>Personally, I like the convention:
>>
>>decimal : ordinal : cardinal
>>0       : zero    : first
>>1       : one     : second
>>2       : two     : third
>>...
>>
>>And while this is not the only convention that can be used, I think
>>it's probably also important to emphasize that people do use different
>>conventions at times.
>>
>>Another classic case where these sorts of distinctions can be
>>important is "clock arithmetic".
>>
>>--
>>Raul
>>
>>
>>On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Dan T. Abell <dab...@txcorp.com> wrote:
>>> Yes, you're quite right about that. Which would explain
>>> why I scrapped my initial (zeroth?) answer for one that
>>> tried to coney a sense of delight in Henry's notation
>>> as a tool of communication (as opposed to being perfectly
>>> accurate).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>        -Dan
>>>
>>> On 17 Dec 2011, at 13:50, Bo Jacoby wrote:
>>>
>>>> That does not make the first problem 'problem 0'. Henry's problems are 
>>>> items, not in-betweens.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> Fra: Dan T. Abell <dab...@txcorp.com>
>>>>> Til: Programming forum <programming@jsoftware.com>
>>>>> Sendt: 21:21 lørdag den 17. december 2011
>>>>> Emne: Re: [Jprogramming] J Midterm exam 2011
>>>>>
>>>>> Ahhh, yes. But what a great way to emphasise that we
>>>>> begin at zero. We begin our first trip about the sun at
>>>>> age zero. Before the baker add that first donut, the box
>>>>> contains zero donuts. ...
>>>>>
>>>>> We programmers train ourselves (and future programmers)
>>>>> to count the jumps, use indices to label the in-betweens
>>>>> (including that pesky leading "in-between" we call '0'),
>>>>> and then work to catch all our off-by-one errors.
>>>>>
>>>>>     -Dan
>>>>> :-P
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17 Dec 2011, at 12:54, Bo Jacoby wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> when kids count they still say: one two three
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dan T. Abell :: dabell at txcorp dot com :: 303.444.2452
>>>>> Tech-X Corp., 5621 Arapahoe Ave, Ste A, Boulder CO 80303
>>>>> http://www.txcorp.com :: 303.748.6894/c  303.448.7756/fx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dan T. Abell :: dabell at txcorp dot com :: 303.444.2452
>>> Tech-X Corp., 5621 Arapahoe Ave, Ste A, Boulder CO 80303
>>> http://www.txcorp.com :: 303.748.6894/c  303.448.7756/fx
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to