Ugh... Should have included the unnecessary ()s ... i.e. (>&5) i. 10
- joey iPh On Dec 24, 2011, at 5:37 PM, Joey K Tuttle <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, but - > >> &5 i. 10 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 > > - joey iPh... > > On Dec 24, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Björn Helgason <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 21 >&20 >> |syntax error >> | 21>&20 >> 21 >20 >> 1 >> >> 2011/12/24 Marshall Lochbaum <[email protected]> >> >>> false;" was clearer than the J equivalent ">&20". I hope you can see past >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
