I get the following error attempting this under Windows XP:

   start 10
duty: starts...
|value error: jmf
|   fi=.jpath'~temp/',    jmf tolower y

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Ian Clark <earthspo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Following Bill's warning, I've just corrected the downloadable script:
> alivedemo.ijs at:
>   http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Scripts/AliveDemo
> The "server" now accesses its jmf file using map_jmf, but the client
> uses share_jmf_.
>
> Can somebody please verify it works under Windows and tell me? (I
> don't currently have a windows machine).
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Ian Clark <earthspo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've just noticed that if IFUNIX then share_jmf_ calls map_jmf_ to do
> > the job. But if IFUNIX=0 then the code for share and map are
> > different. Quite likely it won't work as it stands under Windows. The
> > workaround is for mapex to check the value of CLIENT and use map_jmf_
> > if CLIENT=0, else share_jmf_ .
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:17 AM, bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Ian,
> >>
> >> I have not study the source carefully, but at the first glance, it
> seemed
> >> that two running J processes accessing the same mapped file.  Why
> >> share_jmf_ was not needed?  Please correct me if I missed anything.
> >>
> >> Вск, 08 Янв 2012, Ian Clark писал(а):
> >>> This is my eventual solution to the "are you alive?" problem:
> >>>
> >>>    http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Scripts/AliveDemo
> >>>
> >>> It doesn't use sockets, but a couple of mapped files instead. The
> >>> (identically coded) processes use them to play pat-a-cake.
> >>>
> >>> For demo simplicity I've coded a 'hard' duty cycle (a while.-loop.)
> >>> rather than one I find much more convenient: a "soft" duty cycle that
> >>> posts an event calling itself again after a given interval.
> >>>
> >>> A "soft" duty cycle has a lot of advantages. You have to play with the
> >>> alternatives to appreciate them, but the main ones are that it dies
> >>> gracefully if there's a code error, and it doesn't lock the session
> >>> window and any UI which the duty cycle happens to be managing. Indeed
> >>> the duty cycle runs in the background, keeping all displays up-to-date
> >>> and leaving you (almost) full use of J facilities.
> >>>
> >>> I'll place a "soft" duty cycle code sample on the wiki in a day or two.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Ian Clark <earthspo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> > Please forgive these questions I post to the list to which I know the
> >>> > answer. Or rather: *an* answer. I learn a lot from others' responses.
> >>> > Even if it's "my way is best after all" -- that's a valuable thing to
> >>> > know.
> >>> >
> >>> > I have two separate J processes running (assume Linux / Darwin,
> though
> >>> > I'm keen on cross-platform solutions). They communicate by each
> >>> > writing a text file which is read by the other
> >>> > (keep-it-simple-stupid). Is there a neat, robust way of one process
> >>> > asking the other: "are you there?" or "are you still alive?"
> >>> >
> >>> > I'm au-fait with how the yellow-J works, all the solutions involving
> >>> > timer-driven duty-cycles, timeouts, and reading files written by the
> >>> > sister process, Or the files' timestamps, or permissions. But these
> >>> > all seem so clunky. I guess what I want is something that was so easy
> >>> > in the 1970s but is so awkward on today's machines: just reserve a
> >>> > pair of bits in absolute memory -- or a pair of pixels on the screen
> >>> > -- or some inessential system flags -- and play pat-a-cake with them.
> >>> >
> >>> > Once upon a time there was such a thing as "common memory".
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>
> >> --
> >> regards,
> >> ====================================================
> >> GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> >> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>



-- 
Devon McCormick, CFA
^me^ at acm.
org is my
preferred e-mail
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to