Looking at the formula, it appears to me that the normal distribution
is modeling a distribution of prices.  In fact, this is explicitly
stated here - http://bradley.bradley.edu/~arr/bsm/pg04.html - in
assumption six: "returns on the underlying stock are normally
distributed".

So the distribution is the model for the price of the underlying.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:31 PM, KM Chakahwata
<kmchakahw...@first-derivative.com> wrote:
> sorry, I meant "expected option price", as of valuation date. for call, this
> would be Expected(S-K), which is the same as Expected(S)-K
>
> enjoy
> ken
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: programming-boun...@jsoftware.com
> [mailto:programming-boun...@jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of KM Chakahwata
> Sent: 17 April 2012 20:39
> To: 'Programming forum'
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] black-scholes and levy distribution
>
> the special form of Black-Scholes equation is based on the root stochastic
> differential equation that, through a series of so-called risk-neutral
> arguments leads to stock (or underlying) prices being lognormal. then we
> just find the present value (using risk free rate) of the expected stock
> price at expiration -- where the expectation is with respect to the
> lognormal distribution -- or normal when appropriate transformations are
> made from lognormal to normal (for mean and variance).
>
> now, given this, i dont know whether one can simply replace the cummulative
> distribution function "N" in BS formula with the appropriate Levy
> equivalent. i dont know that much about Levy, but i would be very pleasantly
> surprised if this is indeed the case -- but somehow i doubt it. i suspect
> you may have to go back to first principles and actually integrate the
> expectation equation somehow, assuming the risk neutral arguments still
> apply.
>
> anyone know for sure?
>
> enjoy
> ken
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: programming-boun...@jsoftware.com
> [mailto:programming-boun...@jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Devon McCormick
> Sent: 17 April 2012 19:51
> To: Programming forum
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] black-scholes and levy distribution
>
> Raul -
>
> I've thought about this.  Basically, you want to replace "N" (normal
> distribution) with "L" (Levy distribution) in the formula.  This would
> require changing the "cnd" verb in McDonnel's essay to a "cld"
> (cumulative Levy distribution) verb, which gets right to the heart of
> the most complex piece of that code.
>
> I guess you've figured out how to write the Levy distribution verb?
> This is the crucial thing to get right - here's some graphs of it:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9vy_distribution .
>
> What is "levychar"?  Do you have some examples of using these verbs?
>
> Regards,
>
> Devon
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was reading
> http://triplehelixblog.com/2012/04/fractal-finance-a-rogue-mathematician%E2%
> 80%99s-search-for-answers/
>> and then I was reading wikipedia's writeup on the levy distribution
>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9vy_distribution) and then I was
>> poking around on jsoftware.com to find an implementation of erfc
>>
>> That gets me to here:
>>
>> require 'stats/distribs'
>> erfc=: erfc_pdistribs_
>>
>> NB. m: location parameter (domain: y > m)
>> NB. n: scale parameter
>> levypdf=:2 :0
>>  (%: n%o.2) * ^@(n % 2 * m - ]) % 1.5  ^~ m -~ ]
>> )
>>
>> levydist=:2 :0
>>  erfc@%:@(n % 2 * m -~ ])
>> )
>>
>> NB. no graph of this one -- it's complex -- not sure how to detect
>> stupid mistakes
>> levychar=:2 :0
>>  ^@((0j1*m)&* - 0j_2 %:@*n*])
>> )
>>
>> But I noticed this writeup on black-scholes:
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/papers/play193.htm and I got to wondering how
>> that would be rephrased if it used the assumptions that lead to the
>> levy distribution.
>>
>> Does anyone know how to approach this problem?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Raul
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>
>
> --
> Devon McCormick, CFA
> ^me^ at acm.
> org is my
> preferred e-mail
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm



-- 
Devon McCormick, CFA
^me^ at acm.
org is my
preferred e-mail
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to