I doubt the effort for this generalization is worthwhile. I'd want to see a lot more users wanting a lot more variety in what jfilesrc allows before putting effort into this area. A single user can provide their own unique override mechanism.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:16 PM, bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com> wrote: > The private version will be overwritten in the next update. Another > way is to define mimetypes_jfilesrc_ in private jhs config, and change logic > of jfilesrc so that it will define mimetypes_jfilesrc_ only when that name has > not yet been defined. > > Пнд, 30 Апр 2012, Eric Iverson писал(а): >> I'm not sure that is generally useful or a good idea. This might be >> something were it is better for you to deal with the extra >> complication of updating your private version to allow exe. >> >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:31 PM, William Szuch <bsz...@wsa-fincon.com.au> >> wrote: >> > Can the file extension exe be included in the next upgrade jfilesrc.ijs. >> > >> > >> > >> > Regards >> > >> > >> > >> > Bill Szuch >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > -- > regards, > ==================================================== > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
