On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 03:10:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:49:35PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote: > > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 02:43:22PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > > > > Would you be amenable to the following update for wireless-tools for > > > etchnahalf? > > > > > > Up WE_VERSION_MAX to 22. > > [...] > > > the upstream author believes no incompatibilities were introduced in > > > WE 22: > > > http://teams.debian.net/lurker/message/20080104.182703.557bed3b.it.html > > > > > > Upping WE_VERSION_MAX to 22 tells wireless-tools that it is > > > forward-compatible with version 22 of WE and silences the scary > > > warning to the user. > > > > Sure, that's OK with me. Do I have to do something? > > Thanks for the speedy reply! > Here are the next steps - handle any of the pieces you want to and > feel free to lob any/all of them back at me. > > 1) Send the patch to debian-release, asking for permission to upload > to stable (good to put "[stable]" in the subject) > 2) Assuming approval, prepare a package with an etchnhalf version > (I'd recommend 28-1+etchnhalf.1 or similar - having 'etchnhalf' > in the version is a requirement) and a target distribution of > 'stable'. And obviously this should be built in a clean etch > environment. > 3) Test (if you want me to do this, i'd appreciate any suggested test > cases you have) > 4) Upload :)
hey Guus, Would you like me to handle the upload? -- dann frazier -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
