Hello Patrick, ok I understand and I will follow your advice. Moreover mixing fulltext with other indexes in the same list is confusing for the user as it suggest that they are from the same family.
I think that having a checkbox or button to run the search on the fulltex index (setting &f=fulltext in url) should be a good alternative. I have a related question: why in advanced search the snippets are not displayed? This should allows to mix all fields and fulltext search. Thanks, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Johnny Mariéthoz RERO, Av. de la Gare 45, CH - 1920 MARTIGNY Téléphone: +41(0)27 721 8579 Fax : +41(0)27 721 8586 Web : http://www.rero.ch ReroDoc : http://doc.rero.ch, doc.supp...@rero.ch ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Le 4 déc. 2012 à 15:05, Patrick Oliver Glauner a écrit : > Hi Alexander > > Thanks for your message! I absolutely agree, that fulltext should not be > included by default in "all" index. Nevertheless, many people love a > Google-like search and subconsciously expect fulltext to be queried > automatically. > The solution will be configurable. We will see how it is going to look > exactly as soon as I implement it. > > Regards > Patrick > > ________________________________________ > From: Alexander Wagner [a.wag...@fz-juelich.de] > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 2:57 PM > To: Patrick Oliver Glauner > Cc: Johnny Mariéthoz; project-invenio-devel (Invenio developers mailing-list) > Subject: Re: Default full text search with SOLR > > On 04.12.2012 14:33, Patrick Oliver Glauner wrote: > > Hi! > >> Awesome! And a Google-like search field should also definitely query the >> fulltext index. > > I may mention that it is IMHO not advisable at all to include full texts > _by default_ in "all" index. You just get to much garbage in the results. > > Think of someone searching the papers of Smith, John. Searching full > text by default will give you all papers mentioning a "Smith, John" > anywhere. Be it authorship, citations within the text as it is just a > sample name, what have you... Results will be bad enough if you just > search metadata. Or think of stuff like "mentioned in the book of Smith" > or "we handle x y z but not <your search term>". > > For some time a huge union catalogue did something like full text > indexing of reviews only. From one day to the next you were not even > able to find Gerthsens Physik anymore just as all discussions of physics > books that compared book X with Gerthsen floated to the top of the list. > > You can check this easily in some of those commercially available > "discovery" systems. You can discover there a lot you just don't find > your papers anymore ;> > > IMHO full text indices/searches are WAY overrated. But that's my > personal opinion of course ;) > > -- > > Kind regards, > > Alexander Wagner > Subject Specialist > Central Library > 52425 Juelich > > mail : a.wag...@fz-juelich.de > phone: +49 2461 61-1586 > Fax : +49 2461 61-6103 > www.fz-juelich.de/zb/DE/zb-fi > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH > 52425 Juelich > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich > Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498 > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher > Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender), > Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt, > Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
