This mail is an automated notification from the task tracker
of the project: Gna! Administration.
/**************************************************************************/
[task #820] Latest Modifications:
Changes by:
Vincent Caron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
'Date:
Wed 10/20/04 at 10:32 (Europe/Paris)
------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
OK, let's say I like the 'testautobuild' one, looks neat and raise tons of
questions as comparisons against Tinderbox or the Debian build process arise. I
think Brilliant is a bit too academic and most documentation is in french. As
for gswebkit, the only objc webapp I know is OpenGroupWare, but it's still
interesting.
Next time we'll choose a game, ok ? :)
Some questions for testautobuild (need rephrasing):
* Do you propose/maintain a collection of reciepe (in the Gentoo or uOS style)
to 'testautobuild' some popular packages ?
* What is the difference with other popular unattented build packages, like eg.
Tinderbox ?
* Aren't you overlapping some distro packaging tools functionnality ? (Eg.
RedHat and Debian also use procedures to package from 'pristine sources' and
make automation easy; including chroots, installed files discovery, autodeps,
etc)
/**************************************************************************/
[task #820] Full Item Snapshot:
URL: <http://gna.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=820>
Project: Gna! Administration
Submitted by: Mathieu Roy
On: Mon 10/11/04 at 14:40
Should Start On: Mon 10/11/04 at 00:00
Should be Finished on: Mon 12/20/04 at 00:00
Category: Day-to-day
Priority: 5 - Normal
Resolution: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Percent Complete: 0%
Status: Open
Effort: 0.00
Summary: hotspot #2
Original Submission: Purpose etc, see task #598
Follow-up Comments
------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed 10/20/04 at 10:32 By: Vincent Caron <zerodeux>
OK, let's say I like the 'testautobuild' one, looks neat and raise tons of
questions as comparisons against Tinderbox or the Debian build process arise. I
think Brilliant is a bit too academic and most documentation is in french. As
for gswebkit, the only objc webapp I know is OpenGroupWare, but it's still
interesting.
Next time we'll choose a game, ok ? :)
Some questions for testautobuild (need rephrasing):
* Do you propose/maintain a collection of reciepe (in the Gentoo or uOS style)
to 'testautobuild' some popular packages ?
* What is the difference with other popular unattented build packages, like eg.
Tinderbox ?
* Aren't you overlapping some distro packaging tools functionnality ? (Eg.
RedHat and Debian also use procedures to package from 'pristine sources' and
make automation easy; including chroots, installed files discovery, autodeps,
etc)
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon 10/18/04 at 14:41 By: Mathieu Roy <yeupou>
Hum, I never thought about the procedure to follow in the current case. :|
What do we do now?
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon 10/18/04 at 14:34 By: Vincent Caron <zerodeux>
I'll have:
- slune
- wormux
I tried to find something else than games, but nothing really convinced me :).
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri 10/15/04 at 11:36 By: Mathieu Roy <yeupou>
My vote goes for:
- brillant
- testautobuild
- gswebkit
And yours, Vincent ?
For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://gna.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=820>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
