[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Nickolay Ponomarev wrote: > >> > nsIXULRuntime is better for Firefox/Thundebird 1.5. > >> > >> "Better" inhowfar? > >> > > For one thing it was created specially for that purpose. > > Huh. That doesn't make it any better, especially in the aviary world. ;-) > > > It's also accessible from XPCOM components, both JS and C++, unlike > navigator.* > > Okay, that's a real plus. > > > The real extensions are those that show up in the Extensions window. > > Strange reasoning.
But aren't they the only extensions which can be disabled, uninstalled or upgraded from the user interface? I can't imagine wanting to ship an extension without those facilities. Matthew _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
