Where did Robert write that? AMO is for less skilled users... but as for every useful extension being on AMO, really? I would debate that.
If by "normal users" he means the kind that don't know anything... I say too bad for them. AMO is already for them... If by "normal users" he means people who know their way around, and can figure out things when they need to... well if they are having a hard time navigating around... then maybe there is an issue. I must be in the really really advanced group... cause I could find the top 50 projects and our own project in a few clicks. Seemed to be straight forward enough. I think there is nothing to the argument. jmo On Nov 18, 2007 6:40 PM, Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Getting feedback is fine, but... > > Robert Kaiser wrote: "mozdev is hard to navigate for novices" > and "every useful extension for end users should be on AMO." > later he adds: "mozdev is not well-navigatable by normal users" > so I guess we all here are wasting out time on mozdev.org > > If, and I said *if* mozdev.org _is_ hard to navigate somehow, > then I guess we should take care of it, by making a change but > not by ignoring it. > > What do you think? Do we need to make a change, and if that is a yes > what should we change? > > -- > Michael Vincent van Rantwijk > - MultiZilla Project Team Lead > - XUL Boot Camp Staff member (ActiveState Training Partner) > - iPhone Application Developer > > _______________________________________________ > Project_owners mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners > _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
