Eric H. Jung wrote: > --- Myk Melez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'll note that AMO knows that review is a problem, and they tried to >> address it with the recent update, adding a "sandbox" in which addons >> are accessible before being reviewed. >> >> I think they missed the mark, although the sandbox is a good idea, >> because they didn't lower the bar to contributing reviews, so it's still >> just as hard to get an addon to go public, even if savvy users can find >> it in the sandbox. > > Perhaps hiring one, two, or even three full-time employees dedicated to AMO > reviewing would solve > the problem, but that isn't for me to speculate and this isn't, of course, > the appropriate venue > for such speculation. In any case, given their USD 70 million endowment, such > an approach doesn't > seem unreasonable.
That is exactly what I said in a previous/other thread in one of the newsgroups, to lift the main problem of AMO. Let me also remind some people here that I personally, Raj (our webmaster) and my father tried to get an old version i.e. MultiZilla v1.6.4.0 off AMO, and this for two years without a single reply! -- Michael Vincent van Rantwijk - MultiZilla Project Team Lead - XUL Boot Camp Staff member (ActiveState Training Partner) - iPhone Application Developer _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
