On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:05:30 +1000, Trevor Hobson wrote: > I would like suggestions as to what licence I should/can apply to the > Objection > extension.
IANAL and I don't even play one on TV. > The original author has specified: > There are no licensing issues in relation to my code. As far as I'm > concerned it's completely open source - any particular license you'd > recommend? Mozilla Public License? Take it and do whatever you like > with it. Looks like he has assigned all rights to you so you can re licence his code in whatever way you like. > I ported some code from a Python library and the author stated: > Public Domain, No Licencing issues. > (I have this in a separate .js file) Put a comment at the top of this file stating where you ported it from and the fact that the original is public domain. The fact that you ported it to another language might make it a different animal, in which case you own all rights to this version. > I also included some code form: > Firefox 1.5 passwordManager.js You can use any of the three licences that the Firefox/Mozilla source code comes in, but in the spirit of mozilla org I suggest you maintain the tri-licence. > I do not particularly care what my code is distributed under. The mozilla tri-licence is probably the most flexible. Phil -- Philip Chee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. [ ]Logic means arriving at wrong conclusions with assurance. * TagZilla 0.066.6 _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
