Dear Brian, (and Chris) Thanks for responding so quickly.
> It is very easy to turn off Mozdev branding and put whatever layout and >... > Does G.Code allow for such deep customisation? No, Mozdev is much more flexible, but it seems that most projects don't take advantage of this. Running down the top-50 projects I find many of the homepages confusing at first glance. (Which links are project links and which are mozdev links?) > BZ is a logical choice for us because of the Mozilla link. Many project > owners provide alternative avenues for feedback and bug reporting, but > in general BZ works well for many. I totally agree. I just wanted to raise the point that it's a developer tool not an end-user tool for collecting reports. > > * SVN > I am not sure about a few weeks, but it is the #1 priority right now. Great! > I think if you look closer, you will find a lot of other features on > Mozdev. For example, there is a Drupal installation with a wiki, forums, > and other features that are available to all project owners. That's cool, although G.Code has a wiki and I find G.Groups works well as a forum. > And the project stats page that is in the works will provide a lot of > useful information. See: > http://www.mozdev.org/drupal/blog/Project-overview-page Very cool. That will really make the project pages more attractive. Aside from SVN and Secure Updates, I think the choice comes down to the desired level of customisation. With G.Code you can get a project up and running very quickly whereas Mozdev requires more configuration but is correspondingly more powerful. regards, --Will _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
