---On 2008.Jun.03 05:03 AM, Neil wrote: > alta88[nntp] wrote: > >> so AMO is hardcoded as the only such update source within Fx? > > No, it only hardcodes itself as the update.rdf source for all its > downloads. i'm still not clear. when Fx ckecks the update.rdf from mozdev, can it update-in-place the min/max versions if they change, like for AMO extensions? _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
- [Project_owners] some notes about file management alta88[nntp]
- Re: [Project_owners] some notes about file manage... Douglas E. Warner
- Re: [Project_owners] some notes about file manage... Jesper Staun Hansen
- Re: [Project_owners] some notes about file manage... alta88[nntp]
- Re: [Project_owners] some notes about file manage... alta88[nntp]
- Re: [Project_owners] some notes about file ma... Philip Chee
- Re: [Project_owners] some notes about fil... alta88[nntp]
- Re: [Project_owners] some notes about... Neil
- Re: [Project_owners] some notes ... alta88[nntp]
- Re: [Project_owners] some no... Douglas E. Warner
- Re: [Project_owners] some no... alta88[nntp]
- Re: [Project_owners] som... Douglas E. Warner
- Re: [Project_owners] som... Onno Ekker
- Re: [Project_owners] som... Douglas E. Warner
- Re: [Project_owners] som... alta88[nntp]
