On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 07:47 -0700, C. Olofson wrote: > On 04/11/2011 06:57 AM, drew wrote: > > So - is #8 and #8-wht good with you? > > Sharp-looking product (both #8 & -wht). Thanks Drew! > > I've come to this convo very late so please take these suggestions > accordingly. Most have to do with what my failing eyes would like to > think of as legibility... > > - Change the "suite-er" font to match one of those (more legible) > already used > - Is there a grey-scale version of this yet? (otherwise some people > /will/ "just" print b&w) > - Would it be a good idea to indicate the folding-lines? > - Do we have anyone to scan this from a legal perspective? > > Very clean, very professional work. I'd be happy to distribute & > represent this. >
Hi Craig, Thanks and you aren't late at all, in fact I'd been looking at that (the slogan font) and thinking along the same lines, that it needed changing. So - one last (maybe) tweak(s): - Reduced number of fonts -- Front and Back cover - opened up the curve in scatter patter on front cover - lightned background w/ slight tint change - added more white space around logos - softened the shadows by 1/2 under module icons -- asking for a dispensation on the branding guidelines for this - offset version designator and looking at that it looked enough to merit the full print ready version to the wiki. [ where it goes back to being a version of alt-3.png ] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Lrge-cover-alt-3.png I think it's a winner? Thanks Drew Letting the other lists know also -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to projects+h...@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/projects/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
