Assad’s allies drag the region into an abyss
Thursday, 9 May 2013
 
Abdulrahman Al-Rashed 
There is a huge difference between fear for Syria’s unity and of 
threats to divide it. This is not the first time that Russian Foreign 
Minister Sergi Lavrov has spoken in a threatening tone.
Russia’s 
rhetoric expresses Lavrov’s conviction that the support his country, as 
well as Iran, has paid to the Syrian regime is failing. This is why he 
wants to impose a political solution based on reconciliation, under the 
banner of the Geneva Agreement. The Russian-Iranian political project 
aims to convince the West to decline their support to the opposition 
until the end of Assad’s presidential term in May 2014. The act of 
waiting for his term to end is as if Assad had been elected in a 
legitimate manner in the first place! Afterwards, the Russians aim to 
hold elections that guarantee bringing the struggling parties together 
to form some sort of cabinet.
The Russian-Iranian project
The Russian-Iranian project can only achieve two things; dividing the 
opposition and sabotaging whatever is left of Syria. Thus, Minister 
Lavrov threatens the Syrians that if they reject a political solution, 
their country will be divided and sabotaged. The question is; what is 
left of the country’s unity? And what form of regime will the Russians, 
Iranians and Egypt’s Brotherhood vow to guarantee?
Russian Minister Lavrov threatens the Syrians that if they reject a 
political solution, their country will be divided and sabotaged
>Abdulrahman al-Rashed
The Syrians have few options. However, coexisting with the regime, or even 
parts of it, is not amongst these options. Such an act would 
keep the opposition busy and spark additional domestic strife, 
ultimately destroying whatever is left standing. The reasonable solution is 
accepting a peaceful transition that is sponsored and supervised by 
concerned countries, including Russia of course. The peaceful transition must 
stipulate the exit of the regime’s symbolic figures, particularly 
president Bashar al-Assad’s exit to Russia, Algeria, Iran, Baghdad or 
any other country of refuge that will support him. It is also acceptable to 
offer of international protection in areas where there are 
minorities who fear for themselves in the case of the regime’s collapse. The 
first of these minorities is the Alawite sect, which is a victim of the regime 
of late President Hafez al-Assad and his son, Bashar, who 
protected and supported the sect’s existence. In exchange for this 
international protection, the new state is granted protection from other 
parties like Hezbollah and the regime’s remnants.
We would 
advise U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry not to believe the Russian and the 
Iranian proposal, which is only based on American fear. Their 
proposal is based on imposing a political solution that aims to get rid 
of jihadist groups. However, what they are practically suggesting will 
expand the struggle and will strengthen terrorist organizations.  That 
will certainly raise the anger of a majority of Syrians who forcefully 
accepted a solution after 100,000 people were killed, 5 million people 
were displaced and after the country was destroyed. The solution must go the 
opposite way. The international community must enable the majority 
to attain their  political rights within a just democratic system. This 
means eliminating Assad immediately and not a year later.
Stalling the Opposition
Lavrov’s project, which it seems the Americans are unfortunately backing, 
imposed an impossible political partnership. It also imposed the 
obstruction of the opposition’s progress until the middle of next year. 
The first of those who suggested this idea were the Iranians. They 
suggested it under the excuse of preventing sectarian strife and 
controlling the domestic situation. This is closer to insanity because 
it achieves the aims of the Iranian regime as it prevents the 
establishment of a new Syrian state that threatens their interests. 
Lavrov has become the Iranians’ voice. He aims to keep Syria in chaos 
and chronic struggle.
The Iranians’ ideas are always based on 
spreading chaos and supporting terrorism. The Iranians’ idea is to 
always plant chaos and terrorism to scare the people into supporting 
them. It is as if Assad is the forfeit in the game of terrorism and 
chaos!  All of this is for the sake of ending Western military support 
in order to prevent the opposition from progressing, especially after 
Russia and Iran failed on the military level. Their ally, Assad, has 
become a corpse in his own castle. He plays the role of a president in a play 
exaggeratedly performed. He has increased his media appearances 
and visits. He even recently visited a power station, for the first time in his 
life, to tell people that he is alive and actually present 
whilst the capital has become a ghost town.
The Russians know 
that for two years, the Americans have been observing what is happening 
on the ground via satellite. The Americans certainly desire the collapse of the 
regime of their rival, Assad - the ally of their enemy- Iran. 
But the idea that there are jihadist groups operating as an alternative 
to Assad worries them. Now the Iranians are through the Russians playing this 
“sensitive chord” against the Americans. They thus warn that chaos and 
terrorism will spread in Syria, when in fact it is considered that 
for two years now, Syria has been in a state of chaos and terrorism.  
The truth is, suppressing the revolting majority will make it impossible to 
achieve any stability. Subsequently, terrorist organizations like 
al-Qaeda will find themselves many allies for the first time in the 
region’s history.
Toppling Assad and supporting moderate opposition groups will achieve the 
certain result of establishing a new Syria.
 
This article was first published in Asharq al-Awsat on May 9, 2013. 
_________________
Abdulrahman al-Rashed is the General Manager of Al Arabiya News Channel. A 
veteran 
and internationally acclaimed journalist, he is a former editor-in-chief of the 
London-based leading Arab daily Asharq al-Awsat, where he still 
regularly writes a political column. He has also served as the editor of Asharq 
al-Awsat’s sister publication, al-Majalla. Throughout his 
career, Rashed has interviewed several world leaders, with his articles 
garnering worldwide recognition, and he has successfully led Al Arabiya 
to the highly regarded, thriving and influential position it is in 
today.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Post message: prole...@egroups.com
Subscribe   :  proletar-subscr...@egroups.com
Unsubscribe :  proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com
List owner  :  proletar-ow...@egroups.com
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    proletar-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    proletar-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    proletar-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to