Johann Hari: The religious excuse for barbarity
Why are we sitting silently while our treatment of many of our animals
regresses to the standard of the sixth century?
Friday, 19 November 2010
If you are engaged in an act of cruelty, there is an easy, effective way to
silence your critics and snatch some space to carry on. Tell us all that your
religion requires you to do it, and you are "offended" by any critical
response. Erect an electric wire fence around your nastiest actions and call it
"respect".
There's a good example of this religious modus operandi playing out on a dinner
table near you and this week, we found out it is becoming more and more
common. In Britain, it is a crime to kill a conscious cow or sheep or chicken
for meat by slashing its throat without numbing it first. The reasons are
obvious. If you don't numb an animal, it screams as you hack through its skin,
muscle, trachea, oesophagus, carotid arteries, jugular veins and major nerve
trunks, and then it remains conscious as it slowly drowns in its own blood a
process that can take up to six minutes. So we insist that an animal is stunned
before its throat is slashed, to ensure it is deeply unconscious. There isn't
much humanity in our factory farming system, but this is at least a tiny
sliver of it, at the end.
Related articles
* Supermarket chain pledges CCTV in abattoirs to stamp out cruelty
* Search the news archive for more stories
But there is a loophole in the law. You are allowed to skip all this and slash
the throats of un-numbed, screaming animals if you say God told you to. If you
are Muslim, you call it "halal", and if you are Jewish you call it "kosher".
Back in the Bronze Age, or the deserts of sixth-century Arabia, it was sensible
to act this way. You needed to know your meat was fresh and the animal was not
sick, so you made sure it was alive and alert when you killed it. As Woody
Allen once said, it wasn't so much a commandment as "advice on how to eat out
safely in Jerusalem". But we have much better ways of making sure meat is fresh
and healthy now. Yet for many religious people it has hardened into a dogma, to
be followed simply because it was laid down in their "holy" texts long ago by
"God".
Of course, they claim that this practice isn't cruel at all. Henry Grunwald,
chairman of the main body overseeing the certification of kosher meat, Shechita
UK, says that when you slash an animal's throat "there is an instant drop in
blood pressure in the brain. The animal is dead." Similarly, Raghib Ali, of the
Oxford Islam and Muslim Awareness Project, says: "It's not cruel, it is better
for the animal."
This has been proven by science to be false. The Farm Animal Welfare Council
(FAWC) is the Government's senior panel of independent scientific experts on
this area, and their investigation found that "the prevailing scientific
consensus that slaughter without pre-stunning causes very significant pain and
distress". The FAWC chairwoman, Dr Judy MacArthur Clark, explains: "To say [the
animal] doesn't suffer is quite ridiculous."
To give just one example: after you cut a calf's throat, in 62 per cent of
cases, large clots form at the back of its carotid arteries, which means blood
pressure to the brain massively slows and the animal doesn't black out at all.
It stays conscious as it bleeds to death from its throat in agony.
Kosher butchers never numb their animals. Most halal butchers now use some
stunning, but the RSPCA warns that it is at a much lower dosage to guarantee
the animal is still alive when it is killed so it doesn't properly protect
them from pain. The attempts by religious people to explain this away and claim
it is in fact a kindness to the animal are a pseudo-science: the intelligent
design of animal welfare. That's why making meat like this is a crime in
countries from Spain to New Zealand, where an ethnically Jewish Prime Minister
banned it this year.
Yet in Britain this kind of animal cruelty is becoming standard. Over the past
few years, there has been a dramatic abandonment of the numbing of animals
before killing them, in the name of "respect" for a religious minority. The
BBC's You And Yours programme says that halal meat now "accounts for around a
quarter of the UK's meat trade". It is served unlabelled and as standard meat
in Wembley Stadium, Twickenham, on all British Airways flights, at Nando's,
Subway, KFC, Pizza Hut, Domino's Pizza and even swanky Ascot racecourse. There
has been a huge expansion, then, in the suffering of living creatures and we
are supposed to applaud it as an advance for tolerance.
The halal and kosher meat industries are fighting even tepid proposals by the
European Union to ensure that all meat made from unstunned animals must be
clearly labelled. They claim this will render their businesses "economically
unviable". Isn't that an extraordinary confession that if people knew what
they were buying, the companies would go bust?
Atheists who criticise religion are constantly being told we have missed the
point and religion is really about compassion and kindness. It is only a
handful of extremists and fundamentalists who "misunderstand" faith and use it
for cruel ends, we are told with a wagging finger. But here's an example where
most members of a religion choose to do something pointlessly cruel, and even
the moderates demand "respect" for their "views". Their faith makes them
prioritise pleasing an invisible supernatural being over the screaming of
actual living creatures. Doesn't this suggest that faith itself the choice to
believe something in the total absence of evidence is a danger that can lead
you up needlessly nasty paths?
Britain is famously a nation of animal lovers who turn doe-eyed and gooey at
the sight of any furry creature. So why are we sitting silently while our
treatment of many of our animals regresses to the standards of the sixth
century?
It is true that, at the moment, there is a frightening rise in real bigotry
against Muslims and, to a lesser but still significant extent, Jews. Some
people who object to the rise of halal meat try to fit it into a preposterous
narrative where Britain is somehow being "taken over" by the 4 per cent of its
population who are Muslim, presumably via the Protocols of the Elders of Mecca.
I have written many articles against this resurgent bigotry, and I can see why
some people would be shy about anything that would look like piling on.
But the only consistent position is to oppose viciousness against these
minorities, and to oppose viciousness by these minorities. The proponents of
halal and kosher meat are choosing to inflict terrible and unnecessary pain on
living creatures every day. It would be condescending to treat them as
victim-children who are exempt from moral debate and it would be a betrayal
of the real victims here: the sentient creatures having their throats cut.
We need to be much more self-confident in criticising religious claims. Your
ideas do not deserve any special status because you say they came from an
invisible, supernatural being.
No, we don't respect your desire to needlessly torment animals because some
hallucinating desert nomads did it centuries ago. We don't respect it at all.
You can cry that we are "persecuting" you if we stop you committing acts of
cruelty if you want.
It's what the religious Christian, Jew and Muslim alike did when we stopped
you tormenting women and gays and anybody else you could get your hands on. One
of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will
hear from the Men of God.
------------------------------------
Post message: prole...@egroups.com
Subscribe : proletar-subscr...@egroups.com
Unsubscribe : proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com
List owner : proletar-ow...@egroups.com
Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
proletar-dig...@yahoogroups.com
proletar-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
proletar-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
