http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/22/AR2010112204388.html?wpisrc=nl_opinions

Attack on Michelle Obama shows Palin's ignorance of history
      
By Richard Cohen
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 

When I was 11, my father thought it was time to show my sister and me the 
nation's capital. I have only vague memories of that trip - the heat, the 
expanse of the White House's grounds, the Jefferson Memorial. I do remember we 
took Route 1 through Baltimore (no I-95 yet) and it was there that I saw my 
first sign with the word "colored" on it - a rooming house, I think. This was 
1952, and the United States was an apartheid nation. 

It is Sarah Palin who brings back these memories. In her new book, she 
reportedly takes Michelle Obama to task for her supposedly infamous remark from 
the 2008 campaign: "For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my 
country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback." Instantly, 
Republicans pounced. Among the first to do so was Cindy McCain, who said, "I 
have and always will be proud of my country." It was a cheap shot, but her 
husband's selection of Palin for the ticket and plenty of cheap shots from 
Palin ("death panels," etc.) were yet to come. 

Michelle Obama quickly explained herself. She was proud of the turnout in the 
primaries - so many young people, etc. Evan Thomas, writing perceptively in 
Newsweek, thought - as I did - that she was saying something else. He dug into 
her senior thesis at Princeton - "Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black 
Community" - to find a young woman who felt, or was made to feel, "more aware 
of my 'blackness' than ever before." This was not a statement of racism. This 
was a statement of fact. 

It's appalling that Palin and too many others fail to understand that fact - 
indeed so many facts of American history. They don't offer the slightest hint 
that they can appreciate the history of the Obama family and that in Michelle's 
case, her ancestors were slaves - Jim Robinson of South Carolina, her paternal 
great-great grandfather, being one. Even after they were freed they were 
consigned to peonage, second-class citizens, forbidden to vote in much of the 
South, dissuaded from doing so in some of the North, relegated to separate 
schools, restaurants, churches, hotels, waiting rooms of train stations, the 
back of the bus, the other side of the tracks, the mortuary, the cemetery and, 
if whites could manage it, heaven itself. 

It was the government that oppressed blacks, enforcing the laws that imprisoned 
them and hanged them for crimes grave and trivial, whipped them if they bolted 
for freedom and, in the Civil War, massacred them if they were captured 
fighting for the North. And yet if African Americans hesitate in embracing the 
mythical wonderfulness of America, they are accused of racism - of having the 
gall to know more about their own experience and history than Palin and others 
think they should. 

Why do politicians such as Palin and commentators such as Glenn Beck insist 
that African Americans go blank on their own history - as blank as apparently 
Palin and Beck are themselves? Why must they insist that blacks join them in 
embracing a repellent history that once caused America to go to war with 
itself? Besides Princeton, Michelle Obama is a graduate of Harvard Law School. 
It's hardly possible that she is not knowledgeable about the history of African 
Americans - no Ellis Island for them, immigrants in their colorful native dress 
waving at the camera. Should she forget it all simply because she went to Ivy 
League schools - be thankful for what she had gotten and the hell with the 
rest? Why should she be more grateful than Cindy McCain? 

Sarah Palin teases that she might run for president. But she is unqualified - 
not just in the (let me count the) usual ways, but because she does not know 
the country. She could not be the president of black America nor of Hispanic 
America. She knows more about grizzlies than she does about African Americans - 
and she clearly has more interest in the former than the latter. Did she once 
just pick up the phone and ask Michelle Obama what she meant by her remark? Did 
she ask about her background? What it was like at Princeton? What it was like 
for her parents or her grandparents? I can offer a hint. If they were driving 
to Washington, they slowed down and stopped where the sign said "colored" - and 
the irritated Palins of the time angrily hit the horn and went on their way. 

coh...@washpost.com 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Post message: prole...@egroups.com
Subscribe   :  proletar-subscr...@egroups.com
Unsubscribe :  proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com
List owner  :  proletar-ow...@egroups.com
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    proletar-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    proletar-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    proletar-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to