Ah, menurut Abbas Amin syiah itu bukan Islam.
Dan nggkheran sunni pun membunuhi orang syiah.. Dan syiahpun membunuhi sunni.. --- In proletar@yahoogroups.com, "Abbas" <abas_amin08@...> wrote: > > Siapa bilang itu sesuai dengan ajaran Islam !? Itu cocoknya dengan ajaran > SYIAH, tahu ?! > > --- In proletar@yahoogroups.com, item abu <itemabu@> wrote: > > > > Hehehe... cuma Islam yg bisa ngasih solusi ke orang2 gila sex gimana cara > > muasin nafsu gila sex orang2 tsb, bukan? > > > > Apa beda pelacuran dgn kawin muta atau kawin Islami dgn rencana bininya > > langsung akan diceraikan setelah puas? Kagak ada, kecuali yg dua disebut > > belakangan itu sesuai dgn hukum auloh dan ajaran Islam. > > > > Islam itu emang agama yg benar unt para bajingan gila sex, pedophile, > > tukang merkosa dll. > > > > > > http://www.translatingjihad.com/2011/11/kuwaiti-shaykh-handful-of-dates-is.html > > > > Tuesday, November 22, 2011 > > Kuwaiti Shaykh Explains and Justifies Islamic "Pleasure Marriages" > > Posted by Translating Jihad > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqRfhlYQo2w&feature=player_embedded > > > > Translated from video clip posted to YouTube, 17 July 2011 > > > > In the above video, Kuwaiti Shaykh Yasir al-Habib, a Shi'a, explains and > > justifies the Islamic practice of zawaj al-mut'a, or temporary marriage > > (lit. 'pleasure marriage'), which is in a sense > > Islamically-sanctioned prostitution. In the longer clip which I took > > this excerpted portion from, Shaykh al-Habib starts out by saying that > > Sunnis often try to embarrass Shi'a by saying that they're going to > > marry their sisters in a pleasure marriage. > > > > Al-Habib responds by saying that, first of all, in Islam a brother has > > no authority over the actions of his sister. And secondly, he contends > > that Sunnis want him to deny pleasure marriage simply because some > > people find it repulsive, to which he counters that "the Messenger of > > Allah didn't find it repulsive." Then he turns the argument around, > > explaining that Sunnis attempt to deny pleasure marriage while accepting > > marriage with the intent to divorce, which is essentially the same > > thing. > > > > He also brings up a hadith or saying from one of the companions of > > Muhammad, who said that, "We contracted temporary marriage giving a > > handful of the dates or flour as a dower during the life time of Allah's > > Messenger (may peace be upon him) and during the time of Abu Bakr until > > Umar forbade it because of Amr Ibn Huraith" (from al-islam.org). The last > > point about Umar forbidding it is where most Shi'a and Sunnis > > disagree--the Shi'a don't accept Umar as a legitimate caliph or > > successor to Muhammad, while the Sunnis do. > > > > Subtitled video is above, transcript below (h/t Nonie Darwish): > > > > > > I tell him, âCome on, if youâre a man, then give me your sister in > > marriage, a marriage with the intent of divorcing after one night.â I > > could imagine something like that, now that you mention it. You know? > > Now, even if you find this repulsive, the Messenger of Allah didnât find > > it repulsive. The Messenger of Allah approved this marriage by > > recognizing it. The Messenger of Allah permitted and authorized > > (temporary) pleasure marriages. Now even if they later put it in a > > written hadith that he later forbade pleasure marriages, the important > > thing is that it was present (during the time of the Prophet). > > > > >If the marriage was by nature considered repulsive by the Shariâah, > > meaning it was not pleasing to Almighty Allah and His Messenger (PBUH), > > then the Prophet from the beginning would not have permitted it. Why did > > he permit it? I mean, it wasnât considered contrary to the honor of > > Muslim women. Why did he authorize his companions to marry Muslim women > > for a short time, and to âenjoy them (sexually),â [Qurâan 4:24] even > > with a handful of dates? A handful of dates is given to any woman to > > enjoy her sexually, thatâs it. If you say that this is adultery, then > > youâre accusing the Messenger (PBUH) of adultery, or that he legitimized > > adultery. If you say this is repulsive, youâre accusing the Messenger > > (PBUH) of being repulsive, or that the Messenger of Allah legitimized > > that which is repulsive, Allah forbid. Is it not so? > > > > >Pleasure marriage came to solve a societal problem. It doesnât mean that > > it always has to be applied. However, if my sister did that, according > > to its rules and laws, whether she were a widow and her husband had > > passed away, or she were divorced, and so forth; if she needed it (for > > whatever reason), then this marriage would be according to the tradition > > (sunnah) of Allah and His Messenger (PBUH). There is no shame in this. > > No shame at all. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > ------------------------------------ Post message: prole...@egroups.com Subscribe : proletar-subscr...@egroups.com Unsubscribe : proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com List owner : proletar-ow...@egroups.com Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: proletar-dig...@yahoogroups.com proletar-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: proletar-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
