We should graveyard it. If you are concerned about redirecting people to the fork, we should transfer the ownership of the repo.
Le mer. 18 août 2021 à 11:55, Bjoern Rabenstein <bjo...@rabenste.in> a écrit : > On 17.08.21 10:54, Matthias Rampke wrote: > > I think the no-magic route is better. You can also archive the repo[0] to > > make it clear that it's read only (with this GitHub feature, do we still > > need to graveyard anything ourselves? > > That's a good idea. I'll do just that. > > In general, I think it still makes sense to graveyard repos if we want > to reduce visibility, e.g. because continue using the code would be > harmful, but in this case, where you could still use the old code but > should go for the fork for new features etc., archiving seems > precisely the right thing to do. > > -- > Björn Rabenstein > [PGP-ID] 0x851C3DA17D748D03 > [email] bjo...@rabenste.in > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Prometheus Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to prometheus-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/20210818095542.GS3669%40jahnn > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to prometheus-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CAFJ6V0q7hxn064U074mVS-J4FHv5uFqOz4E-Y5c7OhQ96bd5sA%40mail.gmail.com.
