Yes :) What would be the best approach to see adoption and letting the
community collectively know/try?

Thanks,

Rudford





On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:16 PM Bjoern Rabenstein <bjo...@rabenste.in> wrote:

> On 01.06.22 11:28, Rudford Hamon wrote:
> >
> > For example, OpenZiti has a tunneler embedded with zero trust that
> > can be used to connect (upstream or downstream) with a few lines of
> > code. Super flexible and doesn't require any changes to your
> > binaries. Also, as you mentioned, this will give the Prometheus
> > family "end-users" an option to use whatever they feel is best for
> > them. At least with the OpenZiti tunneler, the connection will be
> > free with layer 7 security on the back-end. Once the Prometheus
> > community becomes more familiar with embedded zero trust, the family
> > may consider embedding zero trust at the application level so the
> > project can scrape anything from anywhere without any exposers for
> > both, Prometheus and end-users.
>
> That sounds good. In that way, we can see what the adoption is without
> requiring any changes on the Prometheus side.
>
> --
> Björn Rabenstein
> [PGP-ID] 0x851C3DA17D748D03
> [email] bjo...@rabenste.in
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prometheus Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to prometheus-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CAHFosDQHY8oGbTioAZYbnJ0aYFN8tZJ03abMW%2BWGZz6qSJfZzQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to