> This is, however, not the expected simplification. I decided for
> this simple change, because it keeps the functionality of other
> proof assistants without that I have to touch their code.


This sounds wise, and what Pierre originally suggested, although if I've 
followed it seems as if that's not compatible with his convention of setting 
coq-prog-args in file local variables.

 - D.

_______________________________________________
ProofGeneral-devel mailing list
ProofGeneral-devel@inf.ed.ac.uk
http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/proofgeneral-devel

-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

Reply via email to