schematic uses Ctrl-F to 'find' a component
i like that as it is like 'Find' in many other progs

so what i did what program Ctrl-F in PCB to issue JC, this makes them
the 'same' for me

a set of differences i find more annoying than sch/pcb differences 
though are the ones between the PCBLIB and PCB
RM in PCB  = RI in PCBLIB
DM in PCB  = TM in PCBLIB
and more

re mice:
i never had a problem w/ the MS wheel mouse and Protel over several
generations of machines, mice and installations
BTW, i almost never use the menus, i use hotkeys as much as possible

Dennis Saputelli

> As for Sch PCB command commonality...
> 
> maybe there are some things that differ - but they do have to reflect the
> differences in the actual entities.  I would *hate* a package that tried to
> be so common across the various editors that it sacrificed
> functionality.  But i do have a gripe about Sch and PCB differences - I
> want a J-C (Jump-Component) in Sch like in PCB. But that is about the only
> difference that I regularly hiccup on - oh, and right-click dragging in Sch.
> 


************************************************************************
* Tracking #: 8F8756DA4375C74B8231A084CFB8F3FAEB7308F7
*
************************************************************************
-- 
___________________________________________________________________________
www.integratedcontrolsinc.com            Integrated Controls, Inc.    
   tel: 415-647-0480                        2851 21st Street          
      fax: 415-647-3003                        San Francisco, CA 94110

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to