On Saturday 23 October 2010 19:30:18 Eric Niebler wrote: > On 10/23/2010 10:12 AM, Eric Niebler wrote: > > I've tweaked both the traversal example you sent around as well as my > > over toy Phoenix. Tell me what you guys think. > > Actually, I think it's better to leave the definition of "some_rule" > alone and wrap it in "named_rule" at the point of use. A bit cleaner. > See attached.
I like that. With that named_rule approach, we have some kind of in code documentation: Look, here that rule is a customization point. Why not just rule? Less characters to type. _______________________________________________ proto mailing list proto@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
