On 17/11/10 19:46, Eric Niebler wrote:
See the attached code. I wish I had a better answer. It sure would be nice to generalize this for other times when new state needs to bubble up and back down.
Just chiming in. We had the exact same problem in quaff where needed to carry on a process ID over the trasnform of parallel statement. If it can make you worry less Eric, we ended with the exact same workaround. _______________________________________________ proto mailing list proto@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
